HomeLearn
News & Articles
Market
Tools
AboutNewsletter☕ Buy me a coffee
Retail store shelves with customs paperwork and a refund cheque overlaid

Retailers Are Booking Tariff Refunds as Earnings — and Investors Are Cheering the Wrong Number

Key facts
  • On February 20, 2026, the US Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were unlawful.
  • The Court of International Trade subsequently ordered Customs and Border Protection to refund the duties to importers of record.
  • As of a court filing in early August 2026, the government had refunded more than $100 billion — roughly 60% of what it owes importers.
  • The Penn Wharton Budget Model projected refunds of up to $175 billion.
  • TJX disclosed $331 million of refunds on previously paid IEEPA tariffs and raised its fiscal 2027 EPS forecast to $5.31–$5.36 from $5.08–$5.15.
  • TJX's Q3 adjusted EPS guidance excluding the tariff benefit, at $1.30–$1.32, came in below the $1.35 analyst consensus.
  • The ruling did not overturn duties under Section 232 (steel, aluminium, auto parts) or Section 301 (goods from China).

This is the most under-analysed earnings distortion of 2026, and it is hiding in plain sight in retail results.

When the Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs in February, most coverage focused on the constitutional question and the trade-policy fallout. The financial consequence is arriving now: over $100 billion of cash is flowing back to the companies that paid those duties, and it is landing in income statements.

TJX is the clean example. This week the off-price retailer disclosed $331 million of refunds and lifted its full-year earnings forecast by roughly 23 cents per share. The stock reaction was positive.

But look one line further down. TJX's third-quarter adjusted EPS guidance excluding the tariff benefit came in at $1.30–$1.32, below the $1.35 consensus. Strip out the government cheque and the operating outlook was actually a small miss.

Why this matters more than it sounds

A tariff refund is non-recurring, non-operating cash. It says nothing about whether a retailer is selling more goods at better margins. It is a legal windfall arising from a court decision about executive authority.

Yet it flows through the same reported earnings line that investors use to value the business. If you value a company on a price-to-earnings multiple and the "E" contains a one-time refund, you are paying a recurring multiple for non-recurring money.

This is the oldest trap in fundamental analysis, and it is about to appear across an entire sector at once, because the refunds are hitting importers broadly rather than one company at a time.

How to read a retail earnings report this season

Four checks, in order:

1. Find the refund disclosure. Look for IEEPA, tariff refund, or duty recovery in the earnings release and the management discussion. Companies are disclosing these, but often not in the headline.

2. Separate guidance that includes it from guidance that excludes it. TJX helpfully provided both. Not every company will. When a company raises full-year guidance, ask what portion is refund and what portion is trading performance.

3. Check comparable sales and gross margin. These are the operating truth. TJX kept its annual comparable sales growth outlook at 3%–4% — unchanged. That is the real signal about the business.

4. Ask whether prices are coming down. Retailers raised prices when tariffs were imposed. A Federal Reserve study found US businesses and consumers absorbed nearly 90% of the added IEEPA costs. If the duty is refunded and the price stays, the margin benefit is permanent — and so is the reputational and legal exposure.

The litigation angle nobody is pricing

That last point has teeth. Consumer class actions have been filed in multiple states arguing that companies should not be permitted to keep both the higher prices they charged and the government refunds they received.

Law firms advising retailers have flagged the disclosure risk directly: public statements about refund strategy, especially those aimed at customers or investors, can create unintended exposure. Consumer-facing businesses are the most obvious targets.

For an investor, this is a contingent liability sitting behind a reported gain. Whether it amounts to much is unknowable today. That it is unpriced in most models is fairly clear.

What is not refunded

Worth stating plainly, because it is widely misunderstood: the Supreme Court decision applied to IEEPA tariffs only. Duties assessed under Section 232 — steel, aluminium and derivative products, auto parts — and Section 301 on Chinese goods were not overturned. Companies with cost exposure concentrated there get no relief.

This also matters for the live Canada–US negotiation, where reports suggest metals would remain tariffed even under a deal.

The takeaway

Earnings season is about to hand you a series of companies that "beat" because of a court ruling. Some of those businesses are genuinely healthy. Some are not. The number that tells you which is which is the one without the refund in it.

If you want a refresher on separating signal from noise in a quarterly report, our guide on how to read an earnings report in ten minutes covers the four lines that actually matter.

Frequently asked questions

Are companies getting tariff refunds in 2026?

Yes. After the Supreme Court ruled IEEPA tariffs unlawful in February 2026, the Court of International Trade ordered refunds to importers of record. More than $100 billion had been refunded as of an early-August 2026 court filing, roughly 60% of the estimated total owed.

Do tariff refunds count as earnings?

They flow through reported results but are non-recurring and non-operating. Investors should look at guidance and margins excluding refund benefits to judge the underlying business.

Which tariffs were not struck down?

Section 232 duties on steel, aluminium and derivative products and auto parts, and Section 301 duties on Chinese goods, remain in effect. Only tariffs imposed under IEEPA were invalidated.

Primary sources

Data & disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not financial or investment advice. Figures reflect data available as of August 20, 2026, and conditions change — always confirm current pricing, rates and rules with the provider before you act. Written by Elizabeta Dimoska. See our editorial standards and disclosure.

ED
About the author

Elizabeta Dimoska

Founder and writer of RiskStock. Self-directed investor covering ETFs, long-term investing, tax-advantaged accounts (TFSA, RRSP, Roth IRA, 401(k)), retirement, macro, and markets — in plain English, with every claim tied to a primary source. Not a licensed financial advisor; RiskStock is educational. See our editorial standards.

More from Elizabeta Dimoska →

Comments

Want More Like This?

Get our weekly newsletter with market recaps, educational explainers, and honest takes — delivered every Sunday.

Subscribe Free