Use the normal distribution and z-scores, and explain why real returns have fatter tails.
Pause and write. When something clicks, pause and put it in your own words in My notes.
A description of every possible outcome and its probability. A model of returns is a choice of distribution.
The symmetric bell curve, fully described by its mean and standard deviation.
| Range around the mean | Probability |
|---|---|
| Within 1 standard deviation | About 68% |
| Within 2 standard deviations | About 95% |
| Within 3 standard deviations | About 99.7% |
A z-score converts any value into standard deviations from the mean: z = (value minus mean) / standard deviation. With a monthly mean of 1% and standard deviation of 4%, a return of minus 7% has z = (minus 7 minus 1) / 4 = minus 2. Under a normal distribution the chance of a result that bad or worse is about 2.3%.
| Z | Probability below |
|---|---|
| -1.00 | 15.9% |
| -1.645 | 5.0% |
| -1.96 | 2.5% |
| -2.33 | 1.0% |
| -3.00 | 0.13% |
If log returns are normal, prices are lognormal: they cannot fall below zero and are skewed to the right. This is the assumption inside the Black-Scholes model (RS 303).
Counts successes in n independent trials, each with probability p. If a stock market rises in 70% of years independently, the chance of five up years in a row is 0.7^5 = 16.8%. The binomial tree for options is built from this.
Real returns have fat tails and, for equities, negative skew.
Models that assume normality understate the probability and size of extreme losses. Options far from the current price are priced with higher implied volatility because the market knows this. Risk estimates such as value at risk should be treated as a floor on what can go wrong in bad times, not a ceiling.
Bell-shaped with fatter tails, used when the sample is small and the standard deviation is estimated from the data. With fewer than about 30 observations, use t critical values instead of normal ones; they are larger.
Assume annual returns are normal with a mean of 8% and a standard deviation of 16%.
Time does not remove risk to wealth, but it sharply narrows the range of average annual returns, which is why horizon matters so much in asset allocation.
NORM.S.DIST(z, TRUE) gives the probability below z; NORM.S.INV(p) does the reverse, giving the z-score for a probability. NORM.S.INV(0.05) = -1.645, the cut-off used in 95% value at risk (Module 10).
If log returns are normal, the median outcome grows at the mean log return, while the arithmetic mean grows faster, by half the variance. Over long horizons most investors end up below the mean outcome, because a few very good paths pull the mean up. Projections that show 'average' wealth overstate what a typical investor will see.
A Student's t distribution with few degrees of freedom (often 3 to 5 for daily returns) fits stock returns much better than the normal. Under a t distribution with 4 degrees of freedom, a move beyond 5 standard deviations is thousands of times more likely than under the normal curve. Risk managers use t distributions, historical simulation or explicit stress scenarios to capture this.
Some price moves are discontinuous: an earnings surprise, a takeover, a default. A model with occasional jumps on top of normal day-to-day noise explains why short-dated options on single stocks around earnings carry so much implied volatility (RS 303).
Compare the histogram with a normal curve of the same mean and standard deviation, compute skewness and excess kurtosis, and plot a quantile-quantile (Q-Q) chart: the actual quantiles against the normal quantiles. Points bending away from the straight line at the ends reveal fat tails.
Using several years of daily returns for an index, compute the mean and standard deviation, then count the days with a z-score beyond plus or minus 3. Compare the count with the 0.27% the normal distribution predicts.
Educational content only; not investment, tax or legal advice. Companies, tickers and figures are illustrative examples, not recommendations. Rules, rates and limits change, so check current details with the regulator, exchange or tax authority before relying on them. Worked examples are not forecasts. Written by Elizabeta Dimoska. RiskStock is not a registered dealer or adviser.